I was considering (really considering) going back to my old voice for Ursula—but this feels like backsliding, and i don’t know if i should. the problem is that I can hardly hear Norway blond, and my internal narrator, the general voice that goes on without these checks and balances, was beginning to take over—and I was losing my connection to the future—or at least that’s how it seemed. But to avoid backsliding and an unhealthy obsession with a person that is out of my sphere, I rename Ocasio-Cortez as Anna—I sometimes called her Anna Karenina in a couple books that preceded this series—a book of poetry and a novel. It should be understood then, as I’ve said before, that Ocasio-Cortez represents Ursula—but she is not entirely Ursula—because Ursula is a superposition of women. Ocasio-Cortez just happens to be a very beautiful and powerful woman, a perfect conduit for channeling the future. If she becomes president, which is what I hope for more than anything, then I will have, i think, maximum connection to the future—and the voice of Norway blond—which reminds me of my great-grandmother, a woman that used to talk to her television, will serve as an address but not a filter. I’m going back to Anna, then, as a filter. But yeah, she feels like an ex, and this really feels like backsliding—but her voice is just so much easier to project and pick up on in the nether regions of the center of my admittedly both gifted and schizophrenic brain. I’d be lying, however, if I didn’t wonder what, in our time apart, had changed.