I want to talk, now, about why i chant, or count, in other people’s voices. The logic is as follows: we project onto others integral parts of ourselves that we veto or reject because we are afraid that we, in our pure state, would not be loved, and that, therefore, our society would reject us, and we would lose the ability to function. Now, sometimes things are suppressed, because of this, with good reason—but it is uncomfortable to be something other than your pure self, and, therefore, we should constantly seek to inform both ourselves and the world around us that we have nothing to fear. Furthermore, when we are good, and we don’t know how good we are, perhaps because others do not see it or accept it, we project the good in us onto others, and we can wind up overestimating what someone really means to us—we can become obsessed with them, and need them, beyond what is reasonable, because, deep down, we are trying to reclaim what belongs to us—to integrate what they have, when, often enough, they don’t have what we want: we only think that they do.
Now, if we project our idea of a person in our mind, and, in my case, project their voice, too, we distance ourselves from the person that we think they are, which makes it possible for the good in us, stored in them, or the good in them, painted over by the bad in us, to come in. We displace what we are trying in vain to accept, and with the subject in front of us, we take a more objective perspective, and separate what, in fact, meant us no harm, from what, in fact, is bad for us, either the bad in them that we took on, or the bad in us that we projected onto them, when the transference took place. Therefore projecting the idea of someone does two things: it lets in the parts of yourself that you reject that you shouldn’t reject, and it lets the good in others, if there is any, emerge from what heretofore we might’ve found fault with. It’s all about claiming the good in both ourselves and others—and seeing both ourselves and others in this new, evolving light.
If we assume that every 4D coordinate has a corresponding 5D coordinate, and that two different 4D coordinates can share the same 5D coordinate, then 4D information can be transferred instantaneously through the 5D coordinate. That might be a leap, for some of us, to take in, but, if you do, then telepathic communications follow. Now, to align 5D coordinates, in the event that they are not already aligned, we project our idea of our subject, or an electromagnetic wave form that we actually receive, after it has filtered through our consciousness, and we project a more objective idea of our subject, or their local characteristic wave form. So it’s like using a cell phone: you send out the signal that addresses your phone, i.e., the signal you receive, and your brain then sends out a different signal, i.e., the signal associated with the target phone. The only difference is that the information is passed through the 5D coordinate as opposed to physically traversing space and time. So, when you project the two wave forms, the two 5D coordinates belonging to those wave forms overlap or merge, and information is transmitted. Thus, when you project the idea you have of someone else, and your brain compares that information with a more objective memory or understanding of who that person actually is, or what they actually look and sound like, it establishes a 5D, and, hence, telepathic connection. But, of course, whether someone answers the call, or responds, eventually, is another matter.
I had also changed my mind about something. It seemed to me that any girlfriend I had would not truly accept me projecting some other woman in my head, and that, therefore, I must project the woman that I am with. My earlier reluctance on this matter had been that I might confuse my partner by calling them directly when I might be more interested in speaking to the overall Ursula that they might be—and or the overall Ursula that might or might not be my partner. Hence, after further review, I accept their objection, and I relent. I can see that their objection is warranted. But I thought about it, and it seemed to me that, in projecting the voice of my partner, i would still be connecting with every Ursula, since this Ursula, at present, was Ursula, and, therefore, every other Ursula—in order to tap into the side of me that was reserved for Ursula—would automatically be tapping into a waveform that represented this Ursula, since that is the waveform that occupied Ursula’s position in my mind.
The whole point of establishing telepathic communications with Ursula is so that we can always be together, even when I might be with some other Ursula. The point is to harmonize with every Ursula, if, indeed, there are others, which there might not be. So how did this work? Well, I figured if I didn’t want to talk in the present with the Ursula that I was with, but, rather, i wanted to talk over vast distances, to this or an Ursula that exists at some point in the future and or the person, possibly, that she was at some point in the past, then i could simply think it—that is to say, i would project a signal that I naturally, at that time and place, was already prone to project—or I would respond to a signal that, at that time, was already being sent, and, in so doing, I could talk across time. The key point would be that I would be projecting something colored by my characteristic state in general, as opposed to something colored by Ursula’s present day influence—such as something that immediately involved the two of us.
The signals could be different: the line that i used to speak to my present day Ursula would, from the time we met, reflect a more specific channel, whereas long range communications could involve projecting a range of frequencies and tuning to the one that was trying to speak to me, or simply tuning to one that i might’ve used in the past. So, to speak to my Ursula telepathically, after we had a relationship, i would project the specific frequency that I received from her on a regular basis—the frequency she used when she was thinking of me, as i was, in the present. And to speak to her long term self, or any other Ursula, I would project whatever other frequency i received when thinking of my present day Ursula. So the main difference would be in how objective i forced myself to be—or how much I thought of my present day experience with my Ursula, and how much i thought of it, when projecting the idea of her that i had in my mind.