Forever in a world, and a world apart. In 5D, time and space can overlap, and time and space is defined, in large part, by the frequencies we radiate. I’d determined, then, that the light in our DNA defined our neighborhood, and the landscape that we shared—consequently, we were surrounded by our parents, our siblings, and our children. But, indeed, that meant there were overlapping neighborhoods, and that we did not all see the same thing. So what happened when a man and a woman moved in with each other? I concluded that the house, and the landscape, changed—forming a harmony between the neighborhood that our wife was living in and the neighborhood that we were living in. So, in effect, close up, we saw the same thing, but further away my wife’s landscape would change to match the neighborhood that she lived in.
If i followed her, then, i would follow her into her neighborhood. Our yard would change—perhaps a tree would shift into existence that wasn’t there—encoding the progression i was making away from my neighborhood, and into hers. Eventually the houses, the background that i was used to seeing, would disappear, having crossed a certain threshold, and the new houses, in the new neighborhood, would appear. So, as we walked, concentrated differences in the surrounding area would emerge, and, after achieving resonance, i would emerge in her world—in her neighborhood—plus the concentrated differences that my presence had on the background there. I should note that all differences would denote the progression we were making, and, as such, all differences would be desirable. So she was right—we lived forever in a world, but, in a way, we also lived a world a apart.
What would happen, you might ask, if we walked side by side? We would still arrive at our destination, having made this determination in advance. And when we visited our friends, in their respective neighborhoods? At a certain point, we would both emerge at the chosen destination, no matter which direction we were walking in. So the fundamental factor was the decision to go to a particular place in advance. Then you could walk into your destination from any direction—or shift directly from your home. This conclusion was not so easy to reach—but having thought about it for a while, inspired, no doubt, by information passed on to me from the people that, in varying degrees of importance, were connected to my network, I was satisfied with my conclusions, since i believed, fundamentally, that time and space overlapped in 5D—that points in space, at different locations, could instantaneously exchange information.
Now you see me, now you don’t. Yes, that was the way it worked. She would be used to this in 5D, so it seemed that I might be connecting, in part, with the 4D version—which was desirable, since i would like to believe that, at some point, i might fall in love. Now you’re getting the hang of it. Which sounded, in turn, like something the 5D version would say. Was it possible to have both the 4D version and the 5D version on the line? Why not? i liked the idea that i might reconnect, at some point, in the afterlife, with someone that proved meaningful to me here. But was it possible that i was talking to two different people—two different Ursulas? I don’t see what problem that would pose. Now, i’d been feeling a little nauseous both yesterday and today—and i couldn’t wait for my body to adapt, fully, to the change in medication. Did this semi-limbo state make it more difficult for me to establish a good connection with Ursula? I seemed to be connecting well enough to the great men that i imagined are exchanging information with me. Would Ursula be any different? Possibly, since i hadn’t, in the past, before getting on the risperidone, already established her voice, or the voice i used to channel her.
But I figured things would improve, in fact, as i stabilized, and it became easier to identify me in the spacetime continuum. You love me now. She might have been reacting to my thought that there could be different versions of Ursula out there, different people, which I believed was a possibility, since I had a hard time imagining staying in love with only one person, and being in love, not just loving someone, but being in love, was important to me. But this didn’t have to be the case—i don’t know what God intended for me. Either way, how could I reassure Ursula that the time we spent together, and the time we did not spend together, would always be what we both wanted—what we, in fact, would have been looking forward to if we hadn’t been perfectly happy every step of the way? Practical conditions, such as the difficulty of living alone, or the complications that can arise when it comes to children, in this life, made separating an unpleasant affair—since we won’t necessarily be just as well without help, and we often feel betrayed.
But it wasn’t that way in 5D. Bodies didn’t decay, we didn’t experience physical suffering, and 5D children remained with their parents as a family unit. In fact, 5D children implied that someone was going out of our world, and that this action was intended. That implied that people could exist solely as a function of a bad frequency—a frequency that could resonate with the bad in us, and project bad people, people that, technically didn’t exist. Only when the bad in us was properly atoned for, would these projections leave our world, and it was only after someone had left the world that someone from another world, looking forward to the experience, and the events that it would lead to, could be reborn. So children were not produced like rabbits; they were a function of someone leaving our world, and, because people in the afterlife, over all, are happy where they are, they did not often find themselves troubled enough to envision rebirth, because it would have entailed, similar, but different, 4D parents than the ones we remembered. That said, every event that took place was a part of God’s plan, and, as such, a traveling soul was always taking a step in the right direction—as were the parents that raised him.