9.30.25: Untitled 1 #82

     Ah, yes, AOC was a little hurt, i could tell.  i could try a little harder, in the future, but i couldn’t undo what had been done; on the other hand, she thought i was cute—when, that is, i wasn’t constantly putting her down or saying that she hugged somebody too long.  i couldn’t help it at the time—that’s how i felt, and, now, i still can’t change the way i feel—but i can change the way i think about the situation—which i’ve basically done already, now, that is, that i can (after having discovered her burgeoning weight)—but she must’ve felt, too, that she couldn’t help it, and she still deserved to be loved, which, in many ways was true, just not, perhaps, by me—or maybe any consideration she would have had for me was based on her weight and the compromise she’d made when she, for whatever reasons, saw past my schizophrenia, which, i guess, is comparable or worse, genetically speaking, when it comes to being overweight.

     The people at Fox news were loving it—so i reminded them that they, as far as I’m concerned, live on another planet.  Take Venus, for example: these people came from Venus, after they destroyed their planet with greenhouse gases, and, i don’t know, maybe they forgot about it—they must have, because here they were, destroying yet another planet, as if it was their nature—as if it was beyond their control, and, unfortunately, the amount of therapy these people were going to need once they bottomed out and realized, (oh, yea, we can’t go anywhere unless we go to Mars—and why don’t they have an atmosphere?  because you went to Mars and destroyed it

     Did the Martians, (the Chinese, i imagine) live in caves as they approached the end?  Is that why their eyes are not set way back in their head?  To pick up more light, or something?  I don’t know, but the people at Fox News must’ve landed on Mars, too, and destroyed the Chinese and then finished off that planet, too.  Who knows how many Venusian have died doing their best to be fruitful and multiply?  But AOC wasn’t going to let the people at Fox news get her down, and, furthermore, she wasn’t going to allow them and their kind (the Venusians) to destroy this planet.  AOC, in my opinion, absolutely has to be the president—let’s hope she doesn’t get suckered by Gavin Newsom, but, if she does, or if they fall in love, and, as such, will have done nothing wrong, we’ll grin and bear it.  Everybody deserves to follow their path.

     That just sets me back a little, and, admittedly, reduces (just a little) my opinion of her—which, i know what you’re saying—to even think that were a possibility is to underestimate her and therefore to insult her, so, sorry, i just had to get that out there before Fox news did it first.  did i have anything positive to say about AOC at this time?  I think I said it already—she has to be the president, if not in 2028, then most definitely in the next best chance she could get.  But I’m of the opinion that, although a rich guy from California seems to stand for all the right things, (and he’s been a lifesaver when it comes to getting in Jack Daniels’s face), his stats actually aren’t that great.  He’s more of a bold reactionary than he is determined or able to reject corporate donors that would no doubt lose money if   AOC   were the driving force behind our country’s natural frequency.            

     I can’t imagine Newsom as the vice-president, for example.  I don’t think his ego would allow it—even if he took the job—i can’t imagine him being happy in a supporting role.  But what if he proves me wrong, right?  Well, in that case, as is often the case when we underestimate people, he’ll win my support plus no small degree of interest.  I ask, then, for him to prove me wrong—I ask for him to prove that we need him, now, more than we need a Latina president—a Latine woman president.  She is the logical next step—she doesn’t even have to do anything but be what she is, and she can still effect great changes to the way this country thinks, a country that, in my opinion, is grossly behind the times—a world in which no war is acceptable, and, furthermore, a world in which no one goes hungry or is forced to live on the streets. 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *